Grounds of Judgment of Twin Advance v Polar Electro Europe BV

I had earlier blogged on the High Court decision in Twin Advance (M) Sdn Bhd v Polar Electro Europe BV confirming that where the seat of arbitration is outside of Malaysia, the Malaysian Courts have no jurisdiction under section 37 of the Arbitration Act 2005 or under its inherent jurisdiction to set aside such an arbitral award.

I now set out the written Grounds of Judgment of this decision.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s